| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136.36 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
My aim is to discuss the history of the reception of George Herbert Mead’s ideas in sociology. After discussing the methodological debate between presentism and historicism, I address the interpretations of those responsible for Mead’s inclusion in the sociological canon: Herbert Blumer, Jürgen Habermas, and Hans Joas. In the concluding section, I as- sess these reconstructions of Mead’s thought and suggest an alternative more consistent with my initial methodological remarks. In particular, I advocate a reconstruction of Mead’s ideas that apprehends simultaneously its evolution over time and its thematic breadth. Such a historically minded reconstruction can be not only a useful corrective to possible anachronisms incurred by contemporary social theorists, but also a fruitful re- source for their theory-building endeavors. Only then can meaningful and enriching dialogue with Mead begin.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
History of sociology Mead, George Herbert, 1863-1931 Social Theory Pragmatism
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Silva, F. C. (2006). G. H. Mead in the History of Sociological Ideas. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 42 (1), 19-39
