Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Reliability and validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire for portuguese adults

2024Artigo científico Acesso aberto
Ver registo simples
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorPires, Madalena
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Fausto J.
dc.contributor.authorAbreu, Ana
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Rita
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-23T11:44:44Z
dc.date.available2025-01-23T11:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description© The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).pt_PT
dc.description.abstractThe Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) has been used often to assess physical activity (PA) patterns. However, the European Portuguese version of this instrument has not been validated. We aimed to validate the self-administered GPAQ, version 2, (GPAQv2) for Portuguese adults. We included 32 participants in a pilot study of a Portuguese adaptation of the test and 108 participants in an assessment of their PA patterns and sedentary behavior (SB) through the GPAQv2. For its validation, we compared the GPAQv2 to the International PA Questionnaire-Long Form (IPAQ-LF) (concurrent validity) and the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer (criterion validity). We evaluated PA and SB at baseline and after seven consecutive days. Test-retest reliability with the Kappa test (k) and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ranged from strong to almost perfect (k: 0.864-0.976) and from moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.56-0.994), respectively. Concurrent validity, assessed by Spearman's Correlation Coefficient, was moderate to substantial (rho: 0.471-0.680), and there was fair to substantial criterion validity (rho: 0.226-0.672). Bland-Altman plots showed that the GPAQv2 overestimated vigorous and moderate to vigorous PA and underestimated moderate PA. The largest difference values were related to SB, since the GPAQv2 underestimated sitting time. In sum, we found the GPAQv2 to have acceptable validity and reliability for assessing PA and SB patterns, and we recommend its use for Portuguese adults.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationPercept Mot Skills. 2024 Oct;131(5):1548-1570pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00315125241266341pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn1558-688X
dc.identifier.issn0031-5125
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/97560
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSagept_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.sagepub.com/home/PMSpt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectAccelerometerpt_PT
dc.subjectComparison of methodspt_PT
dc.subjectPhysical activitypt_PT
dc.subjectQuestionnairespt_PT
dc.subjectValiditypt_PT
dc.titleReliability and validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire for portuguese adultspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1570pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue5pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1548pt_PT
oaire.citation.titlePerceptual and Motor Skillspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume131pt_PT
person.familyNameRibeiro
person.familyNameFernandes
person.familyNameBorges
person.familyNameLemos Pires
person.familyNamePinto
person.familyNameAbreu
person.familyNamePinto
person.givenNameMariana
person.givenNameElisabete
person.givenNameMariana
person.givenNameMadalena
person.givenNameFausto J.
person.givenNameAna
person.givenNameRita
person.identifier1308889
person.identifier.ciencia-idFE13-A604-6D02
person.identifier.ciencia-id4D16-0421-2196
person.identifier.ciencia-idCF14-A125-7B57
person.identifier.ciencia-idC311-AEDD-6DBB
person.identifier.ciencia-id881A-1343-A491
person.identifier.ciencia-id8610-A4F0-88ED
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6811-5352
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4264-1012
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2829-1703
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4449-4597
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8034-4529
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0786-7830
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0925-4245
person.identifier.ridG-9363-2015
person.identifier.ridH-3055-2016
person.identifier.scopus-author-id7102740158
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9a18c3d5-d036-4179-a2b0-1379422a23c9
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb36377ac-6934-4731-9674-31021f84f43a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1b253581-fb30-4d1c-8bcb-d3aaa4e9b891
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbd6b6fa1-5d75-4883-a837-1d2bf9e90b54
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5f44176f-69f5-482c-83cd-ab94425a6ec3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0881e2c9-e3e9-4eff-b1e1-475ca2dfa3fd
relation.isAuthorOfPublication653b9d61-d8d0-40b2-9b5a-0f6f23959fe2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybd6b6fa1-5d75-4883-a837-1d2bf9e90b54

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nome:
Reliability_validity.pdf
Tamanho:
861.97 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Ver/Abrir
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.2 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Ver/Abrir

Coleções

FM-CCUL-Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FM-IMPSP-Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
FM-ISAMB-Artigos em Revistas Internacionais