| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 179.84 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
In his “anti-zombie argument”, Keith Frankish turns the tables on “zombists”, forcing them to find an independent argument against the conceivability of anti-zombies. I argue that zombists can shoulder the burden, for there is an important asymmetry between the conceivability of zombies and the conceivability of anti-zombies, which is reflected in the embedding of a totality-clause under the conceivability operator. This makes the anti-zombie argument susceptible to what I call the ‘Modified Incompleteness’, according to which we cannot conceive of scenarios. In this paper I also argue that conceiving of the zombiesituation is a good starting point for rendering the zombie argument plausible.
Description
Keywords
The zombie argument The anti-zombie argument Conceivability Scenario Situation
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras, Centro de Filosofia
