Logo do repositório
 
Publicação

Bone remodelling of the humerus after a resurfacing and a stemless shoulder arthroplasty

dc.contributor.authorSantos, B.
dc.contributor.authorQuental, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorFolgado, João
dc.contributor.authorSarmento, Marco
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Jacinto
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T11:25:25Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T11:25:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractBackground: New implant designs, such as resurfacing and stemless implants, have been developed to improve the long-term outcomes of the shoulder arthroplasty. However, it is not yet fully understood if their influence on the bone load distribution can compromise the long-term stability of the implant due to bone mass changes. Using three-dimensional finite element models, the aim of the present study was to analyse the bone remodelling process of the humerus after the introduction of resurfacing and stemless implants based on the Global C.A.P. and Sidus Stem-Free designs, respectively. Methods: The 3D geometric model of the humerus was generated from the CT data of the Visible Human Project and the resurfacing and stemless implants were modelled in Solidworks. Considering a native humerus model, a humerus model with the resurfacing implant, and a humerus model with the stemless implant, three finite element models were developed in Abaqus. Bone remodelling simulations were performed considering healthy and poor bone quality conditions. The loading condition considered comprised 6 load cases of standard shoulder movements, including muscle and joint reaction forces estimated by a multibody model of the upper limb. Findings: The results showed similar levels of bone resorption for the resurfacing and stemless implants for common humeral regions. The regions underneath the head of the resurfacing implant, unique to this design, showed the largest bone loss. For both implants, bone resorption was more pronounced for the poor bone quality condition than for the healthy bone quality condition. Interpretation: The stemless implant lost less density at the fixation site, which might suggest that these implants may be better supported in the long-term than the resurfacing implants. However, further investigation is necessary to allow definite recommendations.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), through IDMEC, under LAETA, project UID/EMS/50022/2013 and the Postdoctoral scholarship SFRH/BPD/120079/2016.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationClin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Nov;59:78-84pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.09.009pt_PT
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1271
dc.identifier.issn0268-0033
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/54332
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationAssociate Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aeronautics
dc.relationComputational tools for the biomechanical analysis of the shoulder joint
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.journals.elsevier.com/clinical-biomechanicspt_PT
dc.subjectBone remodellingpt_PT
dc.subjectFinite element methodpt_PT
dc.subjectResurfacing implantpt_PT
dc.subjectShoulder arthroplastypt_PT
dc.subjectShoulder jointpt_PT
dc.subjectStemless implantpt_PT
dc.titleBone remodelling of the humerus after a resurfacing and a stemless shoulder arthroplastypt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.awardNumberUID/EMS/50022/2013
oaire.awardNumberSFRH/BPD/120079/2016
oaire.awardTitleAssociate Laboratory of Energy, Transports and Aeronautics
oaire.awardTitleComputational tools for the biomechanical analysis of the shoulder joint
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UID%2FEMS%2F50022%2F2013/PT
oaire.awardURIinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT//SFRH%2FBPD%2F120079%2F2016/PT
oaire.citation.endPage84pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage78pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleClinical Biomechanicspt_PT
oaire.citation.volume59pt_PT
oaire.fundingStream6817 - DCRRNI ID
person.familyNameQuental
person.familyNameMarques Gameiro Folgado
person.familyNameCarmelino Cardoso Sarmento
person.familyNameMonteiro
person.givenNameCarlos
person.givenNameJoão Orlando
person.givenNameMarco Aurélio
person.givenNameJacinto Manuel de Melo Oliveira
person.identifierEip44s0AAAAJ
person.identifierL-4613-2013
person.identifier.ciencia-id5E17-848F-D48C
person.identifier.ciencia-id9917-8D98-A8D7
person.identifier.ciencia-id0A1B-33CF-B324
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9034-8956
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1160-7302
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0550-6417
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4067-200X
person.identifier.scopus-author-id42361579800
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6603748292
person.identifier.scopus-author-id7103134318
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.identifierhttp://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
project.funder.nameFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication24308552-0855-438d-8616-4134004cffe4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication99eceff7-3745-4d38-bfed-df62e3c46e87
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0b7cdf21-1714-4411-aa09-d26111e975d9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication61b74e54-42b6-4f8f-844c-a86e2313feb0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery24308552-0855-438d-8616-4134004cffe4
relation.isProjectOfPublicationbb9aa881-57b9-4183-bc41-603fce6552db
relation.isProjectOfPublicationfaf0be19-8fe4-4af4-a03d-65bc2004108a
relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybb9aa881-57b9-4183-bc41-603fce6552db

Ficheiros

Principais
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
Bone_remodelling.pdf
Tamanho:
1.5 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença
A mostrar 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura indisponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.2 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: