| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 967.73 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
In this study, a mixed method and prospective design was followed to achieve two objectives: code student
responses to an open-ended question about their teachers’ teaching and examine how this classification relates
with the associations among students’ self-reports on teachers’ message framing (gains or losses), their selfefficacy, academic achievement emotions, and teacher reported grades. 1107 Spanish students in grades 9 to
12 participated in the study. GPT-4 was used to code the open-ended question responses on teachers’ teaching
style. Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested the hypothesized relations among variables accounting for the
teaching styles. Results from the SEM revealed that gain-framed messages related positively with student out
comes, as opposed to loss-framed messages, but only when teachers displayed a motivating teaching style. For
demotivating teachers, messages did not relate with students’ outcomes except for gain-framed messages and
student adaptive emotions. Directions for future research and implications for educational practice are discussed.
Description
Keywords
Message-framing Academic performance Control-value theory Achievement emotions Artificial intelligence
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Santana-Monagas, E., Costa Ferreira, P., Veiga Simão, A. M., & Núñez, J. L. (2024). How (de)motivating teaching styles shape message framing outcomes on students’ self-efficacy, emotions, and grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102420 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102420
Publisher
Elsevier