A carregar...
Publicação
Confronting potential future augmentations of the physiologically equivalent temperature through public space design: the case of Rossio, Lisbon
| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
When considering cities such as Lisbon, which due to their Köppen Geiger classification of ‘Csa’, witness hot and
dry summers, the translation of local bottom-up knowhow upon climatic guidelines has been a topic of considerable
dissemination over recent years.
Depicting upon a concrete case study located in Lisbon’s historical quarter, the results from a previous bioclimatic
study undertaken by the authors were taken further in order to consider how worst-case-scenarios of
climate change (A1FI/RCP8.5) could potentially impact the existing human thermal environment within the
square. In addition to considering its existing layout, public space design interventions were also examined
within different thermal/temporal scenarios through the use the Physiologically Equivalent Temperature (PET)
and PET(Load) indices.
The results of the study revealed that within a climatic worse-case-scenario, and without any adaptive
measures to address Physiological Stress (PS) levels, the majority of the square presented potential PS thresholds
ranging between ‘Extreme Heat Stress Lv.3/4′, with PET values exceeding that of 51 °C and 56 °C. On the other
hand, and particularly in regions prone to high levels of solar radiation, the thermal amelioration effects of the
proposed public space design interventions presented reductions of PET values up to 16.6 °C.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Public space design Physiologically equivalent temperature Human thermal comfort Microclimate Climate change Mediterranean climate
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Nouri, A. S., Lopes, A., Costa, J. P., & Matzarakis, A. (2018). Confronting potential future augmentations of the physiologically equivalent temperature through public space design: the case of Rossio, Lisbon. Sustainable cities and society, 37, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.031
Editora
Elsevier