| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 734.67 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
One of the foundational problems of biochemistry concerns the conceptualisation of the
relationship between the composition, structure and function of macromolecules like proteins.
Part of the recent philosophical literature displays a reductionist bias, that is, the
endorsement of a form of microstructuralism mirroring an out-dated biochemical conceptualisation.
We shall argue that such microstructuralist approaches are ultimately committed
to a potentialist form of micro-predeterminism whereby the macrostructure and
function of proteins is accounted for solely in terms of the intrinsic properties and potentialities
of the components of the primary structure as if they were self-contained or essentially
immutable entities. We shall instead suggest that a conceptualisation of the relationship
between proteins’ composition, structure and function consistent with contemporary
biochemical practice should account also for the causal role of the cellular, organismal and
environmental relations in protein development. The analysis of the folding process we
propose suggests that microstructure-laden reductionist approaches are ontologically indefensible.
Rather than a potentialist form of micro-predeterminism, our analysis ultimately
supports a relational-construction-based view of protein development and potentialities
formation, which requires an indispensable analysis of the dynamical interplay between
the micro-level of the parts and the macro-level of the relational structures of their systems.
Description
Keywords
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Publisher
Springer Nature [academic journals on nature.com]
